A Popular Hiking App Has One Annoying Flaw
Plus, RyanAir goes after unruly passengers, NYT 52 places, people bringing weird things through TSA.
Moments when I feel like I’m still spry are few and fleeting these days. It takes immense self-control not to wag my finger at younger friends and family members who complain about aches and pains and retort, “Just wait till you’re my age.”
So perhaps I should just be grateful to AllTrails rather than gripe about its rating system. Finishing a “Difficult” hike hours ahead of its suggested time and finding it easy or moderately challenging should be a small victory I savor and milk for months.
But I can’t shake how annoying I find the rating system's unreliability. In talking to dozens of readers, my annoyance only increased when one after another told me they don’t even bother with the ratings as they find them too vague and irrelevant.
For the unfamiliar, AllTrails is the preeminent mobile app for outdoor activities like hiking and mountain biking. (It can also be viewed on a desktop.) It is a treasure trove of maps, photos, and crowd-sourced reviews of trails all around the world. It’s pretty intuitive to use. Many of its functions are free, making it a genuinely valuable and worthy technological addition allowing people to be healthy and experience the natural world. It has a paid version that includes the ability to search for trails based on your current location, downloadable offline maps that very accurately track you on the hike, and even the ability to notify you if you’ve veered off the trail.
Nearly two decades ago, I first started visiting my boyfriend’s family’s place in Colorado. His dad had a book a friend of his had put together that had the names of hikes, a summary, important info about how to access them, and so on. It was one of the most cherished items in that house because it gave us decades of hard-won information and ensured every hike we did was a memorable one. I always wished I could have had that for every destination.
I hadn’t thought about that book for years until writing this newsletter, because that’s what AllTrails became. Sure, its offerings are much better in the U.S. than when abroad, and there are still some things one could nitpick on like more info about parking at trailheads or finding trailheads at less frequented spots. But outdoorsy travelers have access to travel-enhancing information like no generation before.
When you are researching hikes, the app includes details about the trail (length, elevation change, etc). It also has reviews by other users who have included helpful tips about conditions, terrain, and photos of the views you can expect to see. There is a user-generated star rating (based out of five) and then AllTrails provides an expected duration and a rating on the difficulty—easy, moderate, and hard.
A big part of preparing for a hike is knowing just how long and difficult it will be—it affects how I pack, mentally prepare, and schedule my day. Yet of the half-dozen or so big hikes I’ve done recently, I found myself finishing hours before the expected duration. Despite the “hard” rating, I would have considered those hikes somewhere between easy and moderate. And I’m not a consistent hiker or in peak physical condition.
I’m not alone. Dozens of readers wrote in about AllTrails and were consistent on one theme—they don’t use the difficulty rating at all as they feel it is essentially meaningless.
“Two ‘hard’ hikes turned out to be cakewalks,” complained one, while another said simply, “You have to ignore it. Basically, entirely, generally useless.”
Sorting through what people wrote in turned out to be a repetitive litany.
“The rating is fairly meaningless to me.”
“I almost always find the difficulty easier than what they list it as.”
“Usability is great but difficulty accuracy is hit/miss.”
“I’ve deffo seen things marked as hard and I know that they aren’t”
Instead, what most said to me was that they look at elevation change and photos to assess how much they want to do a trail, and then read comments to find ones that have a similar sensibility and value those.
I reached out to AllTrails this week to see if they had any insight into how they came up with the rating and if they’ve thought about making any changes.
“Our team of trail data integrity specialists determine these ratings using factors that include route length, elevation, community feedback, and specific trail features like obstructions, terrain, and any skills or equipment needed to navigate the terrain,” they said in a statement.
They acknowledged the possibility of variability in user experience, admitting that “a trail that’s easy to one person might be moderate to another” and that the company rates “trails for the broadest audience, while providing additional information so people have the details they need to be prepared.”
But it does seem strange to me to have just three categories when there is such a wide range of hikers, when difficulty affects hike selection, and it also affects how people prepare. It would not seem to be a heavy lift to amend the difficulty ratings to five and better define them. Or adopt a version of the ski trail rating system. But off the seat of my pants something like Beginner, Moderately Easy, Light Workout, Hard, Advanced Hikers. And then make clear how you’re coming up with who fits into what.
For now, though, AllTrails says: “We do not have plans to change the AllTrails rating system but are always open to suggestions. We love hearing from our community on ways we can continue to improve their experiences on the trail.”
DEPARTMENT OF GRIEVANCES
It’s hard to put into words the devastation we’ve all watched unfold in the Los Angeles area over the past week. My heart breaks for those who lost their homes. I’ve been transfixed by people posting photos of places they were just hiking or visiting next to images of those same places reduced to embers. Just a few weeks ago, I was walking with a dear friend around the Will Rogers’ ranch home and discussing how it was built. Now, it’s one of several heritage sites that are gone thanks to the fire. The Los Angeles Times has put together a list of the dozens destroyed or severely damaged. The fate of some of the Case Study houses remains unknown. I do hope that once we as a society have sorted out restoring people’s homes there is a serious conversation about restoring many of these vital cultural sites.
And while I’m often hard on them here in this letter, hats off to AirBnB for being quick and, as far as I’ve seen, the most generous in response to the wildfires, as well as Uber, Lyft, and dozens of hotel properties throughout Los Angeles.
Roundups of where to go are very difficult tasks, and to keep it fresh and inspired every year is a thankless task. It’s a delicate balance between servicing where people are interested in going and coming up with cool new ones. However, it is remarkable how many of the entries in the New York Times 52 Places list are based on birthdays, anniversaries, and the like. Do people travel based on a city’s 750th birthday?
The TSA released its annual list of the weirdest stuff found in security last year and boy there are some weird ones:
The insanity we’ve all come to think of as a weekly occurrence on planes—from meltdowns to violence to boorishness—is finally being treated like the unacceptable behavior it is. (See the latest: a man arguing with his girlfriend ripped open the emergency door.) RyanAir is suing a passenger whose actions (including pissing in the aisle) forced it to divert a flight. It’s the first time the airline is taking civil action against a passenger in Ireland (for roughly $15,000), and I hope that the possibility of financial fallout will work to curb how people act on planes.
…but speaking of RyanAir, I giggled watching this video on its most misleading airports. I’ll never forget being a college student and scoring a six-euro flight to Paris that landed at Beauvais, which is nearly halfway to the English Channel. Please, when booking budget airlines, ask yourself if the money you’re saving on the flight is commensurate with what you’ll spend in time, money, and effort to get to your destination from a very far airport.
I’m all for cracking down on illegal beach vendors anywhere in the world. Being on a gorgeous beach (particularly in Latin America) and unable to get a moment of quiet is grating. But I don’t understand why you need drones to catch them, which is what the police in Cancun are doing.
And wow this really took the steam out of my desire to go see the Northern Lights...
TRAVEL INDUSTRY NEWS
The U.S. passport fell two spots in the ranking of most powerful passports
Park City Ski Patrol reached a deal with management, ending the strike
International commercial flights have resumed at Syria’s main airport
United States adds Romania to visa waiver travel program
Delta predicts a banner year based on red-hot high-end consumers